robocleaner wrote:Yes it does all look very smart, clever and innovative: But as usual with virtually all Samsung products (at least the 5 I own), it seems to me to be yet another triumph of form over function: It still doesn't suck, and still has a bin the size of a matchbox... which kinda misses the point for a vacuum cleaner, doesn't it?
I must agree with you. However, Samsung bots (especially SR87XX and SR88XX) looks impressive about its image and quality, they still don't 'hide its power', because they lack! Another thing is why new owners - having the possibility to choose - still more often take SR88XX over SR89XX
In my opinion, models SR89XX without dustbin-eptying function (SR8980) must be uncomfortable in typical houses/apartments - although you empty it as frequent as once or twice per day.
a4refillpad wrote:not great on carpet but mine is a fantastic resident in the kitchen, picking up crumbs right up to edges to the plinths. Cannot clean corners as well as this though. Big bins are unnecessary on hard floors and I find emptying once a week with the hauzen running multiple times a day more than sufficient.
I notice that my SR8895 performs brilliant on area carpet, so I don't know why your don't. First series of Navibot had defective wiper - perhaps because of it. Or maybe you put it on mission too rare? Try "Max" mode or let it work 2-3 times per day or so often as needed to get the desired effect.
If you vacuum your floors frequently and empty it after every cycle, then the 0.3 litre dustbin may be sufficient, but in my two-story house it would not be. At least, the 0.6 litre dustbin of my current Navibot is emptied only once.
past: Samsung SR8855 (bad sw) Samsung SR8895 (bad rotor) Neato XV-11/XV-15 Roomba 780 (bad battery) Scooba 385 Roomba 530 2x Scooba 230 (broken bladder), Samsung SR8980, Samsung VR10F71
current: Roomba 620 (bad CHM; repaired u/warranty) Scooba 330 Scooba 230 Hobot-168