Doing a decent job of vacuuming, all in one wider pass edges included and unattended, surely means it's not only more convenient, but even more efficient than an XV-??, and way more than a Roomba. This point that was misunderstood by the Wall Street Journal's tech reviewer that someone mentioned a few posts back.glnc222 wrote:Which also means it will finish a given size space in even less time, one of the main conveniences of systematic navigation from random methods. People need to use the spaces being cleaned.
After a rundown of the specs on the new Neato Botvac, the WSJ's journalist went on to say robovacs were “not the most efficient unless you have an open floor plan and not too many pieces of furniture”. I'd agree that a Roomba is far from efficient, bouncing back and forth across the same spot (maybe) in each room for ages and needing help to do a whole house, but that surely can't be said for the smarter 'bots?